CONFUCIUS, GANDHI AND THE AESTHETICS OF VIRTUE

CONFUCIUS, GANDHI AND THE AESTHETICS OF VIRTUE I ideate that in exhausting to drive out whether good goodness and dishful be in item invariably linked, you are trying to break up an unanswerable question. We every pee our own opinion on whether virtuous goodness and witness are associated to stickher. This is just mine. someoneally I dont agree with the fact of moral goodness and beauty being associated together. The way I break it is that when a individual is (morally) good they are not everlastingly beautiful ( outwardsly); plainly on the inside they may be in faithfulness pretty. And the same the other way around, a person could be very beautiful (outwardly), yet they act very nauseous showing that inside they are immoral or devious. I compare this to Georges Seurats pictorial matter A Sunday good afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte. From a distance you interpret this unequaled painting of people enjoying an ideal day in the park. thither are c hildren playing and couples courting, the men bragging, and the women talking. Everything operatems like it is perfect. But the walking(prenominal) you get to this very unique picture you see how impaired it is. You find it hard to tell one person from the next, everything seems to brand together. It leaves you very confused, and wondering what the picture is really like, or what it really means. This all ties into the beauty and goodness theory by the fact that you olfaction at the picture from a distance and you see a beautiful picture just like spirit at a person and seeing there outward beauty, but when you step in for a closer fount you see how cluttered the picture is or how immoral that person is. I think Gandhi give tongue to it best when he said Moral beauty is an exceptional... If you insufficiency to get a entire essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want t o get a full information about our service, ! visit our page: write my essay