Most of them only oblige in the experiment for the money, none of them new exactly what was truly going to happen. It was supposed to be a safe surround to study weather the violent in prison was collectible to the prison setting, or is it due to the personalities of the prisoner and guards that causes the violence. One of the biggest mistakes that were make in this experiment was that Zimbardo himself was one of the participants of his own experiment, which I hazard had a huge effect on the course of the events. Since He was the superintendent he was on the guards side instead of honest observing without any influence of the direction of the experiment. Another honourable problem accrue when there is an invasion of privacy of the participants, manage when the prisoners were stripped naked.
Zimbardo concluded that the power of an environmental setting or situational circumstances are strong forces in shaping participants demeanor in the experiment, no matter what their personalities or behavioral habits in real life are. All participants acted in the experiment as if was a real prison, they disassociated them selves from the reality, that this is just a research, and their personalities just fade out in the new role either as a prisoner or a guard. They defined themselves based on how others saw them. I think the stereotype about how a prison life should be and how a prisoner or a prison guard should act, must had an effect on their behavior in the experiment.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.